Late last week, Congress agreed to reinstate the temporarily inflated FHA loan limits that fell on October 1.

So for the next two years, homeowners in high-cost regions of the country will be able to take out FHA loans for amounts up to $729,750, as opposed to the $625,500 cap that previously applied.

While this may sound like a win for the badly bruised housing market, a recent study suggested otherwise.

Back in July, a pair of George Washington University researchers claimed that higher FHA loan limits would do little to positively affect housing.

In fact, they noted that the FHA loan limit could be slashed in half and still serve 95 percent of its historic target market.

But we all know times have changed, and the FHA’s target market isn’t the underserved, low-income borrowers of times past.

These days, it’s anyone who doesn’t want to come up with a large down payment to purchase a home.

Thanks to their flagship 3.5% down loan program, the FHA’s market share has risen to about 30 percent of loan origination volume, putting pressure on capital reserves and increasing the likelihood of a taxpayer bailout.

All this at a time when we’re supposed to be shrugging off government support and bringing private capital back into the mix.

For the record, those researchers feel the FHA should hold a nine to 15 percent share of the mortgage market and lower the max loan limit to $363,000.

Fannie and Freddie Still Capped at $625,500

Meanwhile, the conforming loan limit for mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is staying put at $625,500, likely because any more risk thrown their way would be considered unacceptable.

This is a blow for those in high-cost regions of the United States looking to avoid jumbo loan financing and the higher mortgage rates that come with it.

Why? Well, most

Read full post…